| Roberts K, Jentzsch I, & Otto TU (2024). Semantic congruency modulates the speed-up of multisensory responses. Scientific Reports, 14, 567. | |
| Chua SFA, Yue L, Harris J, & Otto TU (2022). No selective integration required: A race model explains responses to audiovisual motion-in-depth. Cognition, 227 (2022) 105204 | |
| Yue L, & Otto TU (2020). The role of context in experiments and models of multisensory decision making. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 96 (2020) 102352 | |
| Otto TU (2019). RSE-box: An analysis and modelling package to study response times to multiple signals. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 15(2), 112–133 | |
| Innes BR, & Otto TU (2019). A comparative analysis of response times shows that multisensory benefits and interactions are not equivalent. Scientific Reports, vol. 9, 2921. | |
| Otto TU, & Mamassian P (2017). Multisensory decisions: the test of a race model, its logic, and power. Multisensory Research, 30(1), 1–24. | |
| Otto TU, Dassy B, & Mamassian P (2013). Principles of multisensory behavior. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(17): 7463-7474. | |
| Otto TU, & Mamassian P (2012). Noise and correlations in parallel perceptual decision making. Current Biology, 22(15): 1391-1396. | |
| Herzog MH, Otto TU, & Ögmen H (2012). The fate of visible features of invisible elements. Frontiers in Psychology, 3:119. | |
| Herzog MH, Otto TU, Boi M, & Ögmen H (2012). When Gestalt processing meets low-level feature integration. Gestalt Theory, 34(3-4), 315-328. | |
| Otto TU, Ögmen H, & Herzog MH (2010).Perceptual learning in a nonretinotopic frame of reference. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1058-63. | |
| Otto TU, Ögmen H, & Herzog MH (2010). Attention and non-retinotopic feature integration. Journal of Vision, 10(12):8, 1-13. | |
| Otto TU, Ögmen H, & Herzog MH (2009). Feature integration across space, orientation, and time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(6), 1670-86. | |
| Boi M, Ögmen H, Krummenacher J, Otto TU, & Herzog MH (2009). A (fascinating) litmus test for human retino- vs. non-retinotopic processing. Journal of Vision, 9(13):5, 1-11. | |
| Plomp G, Mercier MR, Otto TU, Blanke O, & Herzog, MH (2009). Non‐retinotopic feature integration decreases response locked brain activity as revealed by electrical neuroimaging. NeuroImage, 48(2), 405-414. | |
| Otto TU, Ögmen H, & Herzog MH (2008). Assessing the microstructure of motion correspondences with non-retinotopic feature attribution. Journal of Vision, 8(7):16, 1-15. | |
| Parkosadze K, Otto TU, Malania M, Kezeli A, & Herzog MH (2008). Perceptual learning of bisection stimuli under roving: slow and largely specific. Journal of Vision, 8(1):5, 1-8. | |
| Otto TU (2007). Grouping based feature attribution in metacontrast masking. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3 (1-2), 107-109. | |
| Otto TU, Ögmen H, & Herzog MH (2006). The flight path of the phoenix – the visible trace of invisible elements in human vision. Journal of Vision, 6 (10), 1079-1086. | |
| Otto TU, Herzog MH, Fahle M, & Zhaoping L (2006). Perceptual learning with spatial uncertainties. Vision Research, 46 (19), 3223-33. | |
| Ögmen H, Otto TU, & Herzog MH (2006). Perceptual grouping induces non-retinotopic feature attribution in human vision. Vision Research, 46 (19), 3234-42. |